CarneyWatch.ca
Independent Accountability Project
  Investigation Dossier — Active

The Prime Minister Profits.
When Brookfield Profits.
Here Is the Record.

$6.8 million in stock options. An ethics screen covering just 5% of Brookfield’s companies. Three meetings with executives after his swearing-in. Every major policy aligned with Brookfield’s investments. The Ethics Commissioner confirmed it under oath. Under Canadian law, the appearance of a conflict alone is enough to demand answers.

$6.8M
In Brookfield Options
Kept in blind trust, not sold
5%
Companies Actually Screened
103 of ~2,000 Brookfield entities
3
Post-Swearing Meetings
With Brookfield executives
5
Policy Sectors Aligned
Housing, nuclear, AI, green, Maple Fund
In This File
The Law Ethics Screen The Money The Meetings Policy Alignment India Pipeline China Cúram BlackRock Verdict

What Canadian Law
Actually Says

The question is not whether Carney committed a crime. The question is whether a reasonable Canadian citizen would see a problem. Under Canadian law, that’s enough.

A conflict of interest exists when a person’s personal interests influence — or seem to influence — the objectivity of their official decisions. It undermines the integrity of decision-making whether the conflict is real, potential, or merely perceived.

Canadian law does not require proof of wrongdoing. The appearance alone triggers the obligation to act. The Conflict of Interest Act and the Supreme Court both establish this standard clearly.

Conflict of Interest Act — S.C. 2006, c. 9

“An apparent conflict of interest is a situation that could be perceived as a conflict by a reasonable observer, whether or not it actually is.”

Supreme Court — R. v. Hinchey (1996)

“Preserving the appearance of integrity is just as important as the government actually having integrity.”

Sworn Testimony — Ethics Commissioner, December 2025
“It is clear that Mr. Carney’s future compensation is tied to Brookfield’s success.”
— Konrad von Finckenstein, Federal Ethics Commissioner, under oath before the House Ethics Committee

Why the Screen
Doesn’t Work

It covers 103 entities — just 5% of the roughly 2,000 companies Brookfield owns. The people managing it can be fired by Carney. One of them held Brookfield shares himself.

The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner designed the screen after Carney’s mandatory disclosures upon taking office in 2025. Day-to-day responsibility falls on Marc-André Blanchard (Chief of Staff) and Michael Sabia (Clerk of the Privy Council). They must filter files, meetings, and communications to ensure Carney deals with no matter connected to Brookfield’s screened entities or the 500+ companies in his blind trust.

The Screen’s Record — Sworn Testimony
Triggered 13 times. Dropped in 7 of those cases. Carney was blocked from decisions in only 6 instances. Despite this, he met Brookfield executives 3 times after his swearing-in — including once in the Prime Minister’s Office.

The screen covers only 103 of approximately 2,000 Brookfield companies — roughly 5%. The other 1,900 Brookfield-owned companies are not covered.

Privy Council Clerk Michael Sabia himself held Brookfield shares until September 24, 2025. He sold them after learning of the conflict. Sabia acknowledged under oath that he does not possess the list of investments in the Brookfield Global Transition Fund — the fund that determines Carney’s future pay. He is screening blind.

Both Blanchard and Sabia can be fired by Carney for any reason, giving them a structural incentive to act in the PM’s interest. The Commissioner’s enforcement powers are widely considered inadequate: fines for disclosure errors are typically $200.

5%
Of Brookfield Companies Screened

103 of ~2,000. The other 1,900 companies? Carney is not automatically prohibited from decisions that benefit them.

The “Broad Loophole”

If a policy applies to a broad class of persons, Carney can participate even if it benefits Brookfield. Democracy Watch says 99% of government decisions qualify.

$200

Maximum fine for disclosure errors. For multi-million dollar transactions.

Sources
CBC — Ethics Committee ETHI Committee Report Ricochet

$6.8 Million in
Brookfield Options

An ordinary federal official must sell shares immediately if there is a conflict. Carney keeps options worth $6.8M USD, expiring in 2033. One rule for the powerful.

Before entering politics, Mark Carney was VP at Brookfield Asset Management for approximately 5 years. His title: Head of Transition Investing, overseeing a platform of more than $100 billion. Upon departure in January 2025, he held $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options, according to Brookfield’s SEC 10-K filing as of December 31, 2024.

The gain mechanism is straightforward: if Brookfield’s stock price exceeds the exercise price, Carney profits by buying shares at the discounted price and reselling at market value. The better Brookfield does, the more Carney makes.

Sworn Testimony — Justin Beber, COO of Brookfield — November 2025
“When Brookfield’s value increases, the value of the instruments Mark Carney holds increases as well.”
Under oath, House of Commons Ethics Committee

Beber confirmed under oath that Carney could have liquidated his Brookfield assets upon departure. He chose not to. Every government decision that benefits Brookfield has the potential to increase the personal wealth of the Prime Minister.

✓ Ordinary Federal Official
Must sell shares immediately if there is a conflict. Full divestiture is the standard. No exceptions.
✗ Prime Minister Carney
Keeps $6.8M+ in Brookfield options expiring in 2033. Placed in blind trust he populated himself. Profits when Brookfield profits.
$6.8M
USD in Stock Options

Expiring in 2033. Per SEC 10-K filing. Not sold. Not divested.

$100B+
Platform He Oversaw

As Head of Transition Investing at Brookfield, before entering politics.

Eligible for Carried Interest

On the first $15B USD transition fund — until 2032–2034. Confirmed by COO Beber under oath.

Sources
CBC — Beber Testimony Juno — von Finckenstein ETHI Report
Sworn Testimony — Brookfield COO, November 2025
“If the prime minister sold all of his Brookfield-linked assets instead of keeping them in trust, there would be no conflict to manage. Is that correct?” — “Yes.”
— Exchange between Conservative MP Michael Barrett and Justin Beber, COO of Brookfield Corporation

The Meetings Carney
Wasn’t Supposed to Have

Three documented meetings with Brookfield executives after his swearing-in. One the Commissioner didn’t know about. One that didn’t trigger the screen. And trips where Carney refused to say who he met.

1
April 30, 2025 — Ottawa
NorthRiver Midstream Lobbies Carney Directly
A Brookfield subsidiary, explicitly covered by the ethics screen, lobbied Carney just weeks after his swearing-in. This should have triggered the screen automatically. It did not.
Screen Failure
2
May 6, 2025 — Washington, D.C.
Carney Meets Sam Pollock, CEO of Brookfield Infrastructure
Brookfield Infrastructure is explicitly on the screened entities list. This meeting was unknown to the Ethics Commissioner.
Commissioner Not Informed
3
October 2025 — PM’s Office, Ottawa
Brookfield COO Flies to Ottawa, Meets Carney in the PMO
Justin Beber told the Ethics Committee he “took his afternoon off” for this meeting. The screen was not triggered — contrary to protocol. The Commissioner said: “Should it have taken place or not? That is for you to decide.”
Screen Not Triggered
?
September 21–28, 2025 — New York & London
Carney Refuses to Disclose Who He Met
The Ethics Committee ordered the documents. The files received were incomplete. Chair John Brassard sent a formal letter demanding compliance. Nine companies in which Carney had financial interests lobbied his office after his swearing-in.
Documents Incomplete

The Chief of Staff was unable to explain who monitors the texts and calls of Carney with Brookfield-connected individuals. A tax credit benefiting Brookfield was passed without the Ethics Commissioner being informed.

9
Companies Lobbied After Swearing-In

Companies in which Carney had financial interests lobbied his office after he became PM.

The Pattern

“Here we have a pattern of Mr. Carney meeting with top Brookfield executives, who have direct access to the prime minister.”

— MP Michael Cooper

Sources
CBC — Ethics Committee Juno News Hill Times CPC Statement

Every Major Policy Aligns with
Brookfield’s Investments

Five major government policies. Five sectors where Brookfield is massively invested — often via acquisitions Carney himself made while at the firm.

Housing
Modular Housing
$26B
In 2021, while Carney was VP, Brookfield purchased Modulaire for $5B (260,000 units, 25 countries). In 2025, the Carney government announced a $26B modular housing program. The exact sector Brookfield invested $5 billion in.
Energy
Nuclear — Westinghouse
$2B + $80B
Carney completed Westinghouse’s acquisition for Brookfield as VP. Promoted it by name during the campaign. Government invested $2B in SMRs at Darlington. Same month, Brookfield/Westinghouse signed an $80B U.S. partnership.
Technology
AI / Data Centres
$15B+
Brookfield owns Compass Data Centers and Data4 — two giants of AI infrastructure. Carney’s AI policy and digital infrastructure spending directly benefit these Brookfield assets.
Climate
Green Transition
$41B
Government’s green transition plan aligns with the Brookfield transition funds Carney created and managed. He is eligible for carried interest on the first $15B USD fund until 2032–2034.
The Catch-All
The “Maple Fund” — $10 Billion in Public Funds
$50B
One week after Trudeau appointed Carney as advisor, Brookfield pitched a $50B fund: $36B from pensions, $10B from Ottawa, $4B from Brookfield. Brookfield manages everything, collects fees. Covers housing, energy, nuclear, data centres, telecom — the exact sectors in the 2025 budget. Carney was still chair of Brookfield when this request was made. He was not registered as a lobbyist.
Source: The Logic →
Sources
The Logic — Maple Fund Globe — $50B Fund MP Wagantall
The Pattern
Five coincidences is a pattern. Every major government policy corresponds to a sector where Brookfield is massively invested — often via acquisitions Carney himself made while at the firm.

The Full Circle —
Brookfield to Mumbai to Modi

Brookfield holds $30B in Indian assets, targeting $100B by 2030. Carney flew to Mumbai, met Brookfield’s JV partner Ambani, then signed an energy deal with Modi days later.

1
September 2020
Brookfield Buys 135K Telecom Towers from Reliance Jio (Ambani)
$3.4 billion USD. Carney had just joined Brookfield as VP.
2
July 2023
Brookfield + Ambani + Digital Realty Create “Digital Connexion” JV
Data centres in India. Carney is Chair at Brookfield.
3
November 2025
Same JV Announces $11B USD — 1 Gigawatt AI Capacity
In Andhra Pradesh. Carney is now Prime Minister.
Carney is PM
4
February 27–28, 2026
Carney Arrives in Mumbai — Meets Mukesh Ambani
Official meeting with Ambani — Brookfield’s JV partner. Also meets Canadian pension funds operating in India — the same ones investing billions in Brookfield funds.
Brookfield Partner Meeting
5
March 2, 2026
Carney Signs Strategic Energy Partnership with India
Target: 50 million tonnes of LNG per year by 2030 — more than 3x current capacity. Two LNG projects fast-tracked. Days after meeting Ambani.
LNG Deal Signed
$30B
Brookfield Assets in India

Targeting $100 billion by 2030. (Reuters, Connor Teskey)

Who Was Monitoring Mumbai?

Brookfield assets in India are covered by Carney’s ethics screen. Who was monitoring his meetings in Mumbai? The answer is not public.

The Ambani Connection

Ambani sold Brookfield India’s largest natural gas import pipeline. He is Brookfield’s JV partner in data centres since 2023. Carney met him in Mumbai, then signed the LNG deal with Modi days later.

Sources
PMO — India Partnership CBC — India Energy Global News

Who Profits When
Canada Exports Gas?

Every time Canada exports natural gas, it flows through pipelines. Brookfield owns those pipelines. More LNG exports = higher Brookfield revenue = higher Carney compensation.

NorthRiver Midstream — owned by Brookfield — operates 19 natural gas processing plants and 3,550 km of gathering pipelines in northeastern BC and Alberta. This is the infrastructure that feeds Canada’s LNG export terminals.

Inter Pipeline — also Brookfield-owned — is Alberta’s major petroleum transportation network. Inter Pipeline lobbied Carney’s office directly after his swearing-in.

On March 2, 2026, Carney signed the Strategic Energy Partnership with India, committing Canada to 50 million tonnes of LNG per year by 2030. Two projects fast-tracked through the Major Projects Office.

The Money Chain
More LNG exports → more gas through Brookfield’s NorthRiver Midstream pipes → higher revenues for Brookfield → higher compensation for Carney. The man signing the export deals is the man who profits from the pipeline volume.
3,550
KM of Brookfield Pipelines

19 gas processing plants. Feeds Canada’s LNG export terminals.

3x
Capacity Expansion Target

50M tonnes LNG/year by 2030. More than 3x current capacity.

The Explosive Timeline —
Beijing, October 2024

Carney was simultaneously Chair of Brookfield and economic advisor to Trudeau. No ethics rules applied. He traveled to Beijing. Three weeks later, Brookfield got $276M from the Bank of China.

1
September 9, 2024
Trudeau Appoints Carney Chair of Task Force on Economic Growth
He is now the government’s economic advisor. Still Chair of Brookfield — simultaneously. No ethics rules apply.
2
October 20, 2024 — Beijing
Carney Meets Mayor Yin Yong at Financial Regulatory Bureau
The Beijing government documented the meeting on its official website: “Brookfield is encouraged to expand its presence in Beijing.”
Beijing Government Confirms
3
November 6, 2024 — Three Weeks Later
Brookfield Gets $276M from the Bank of China
Bloomberg reveals: 15-year loan at 4% to refinance Shanghai commercial towers in a crisis market (21.5% office vacancy rate).
Bloomberg Primary Source
The Unique Element

In October 2024, no government ethics rules applied to Carney. He could legally act for Brookfield while advising Trudeau on economic policy.

Source: Ian Stedman, York University / Democracy Watch

The Question

Who was he representing in that room in Beijing? Canada, or Brookfield?

Your Employment Insurance,
Their Network

The IT system managing your EI costs $6.6 billion — 312% over budget. Its main suppliers have direct financial links to Brookfield.

IBM Canada is the main Cúram supplier. IBM chose Brookfield Annuity — a direct Brookfield subsidiary — to manage $1.5 billion in pensions for its Canadian employees. Dual role: federal supplier + Brookfield financial partner.

Accenture is the second supplier ($94M in federal contracts). Accenture is a tenant in Brookfield buildings in India and specifically recruits Cúram developers in India.

The Chain
Carney → Chair Brookfield → Brookfield rents offices to Accenture in India → Accenture recruits Cúram developers in India → Accenture delivers the contract to the Canadian government → while Carney is PM. Has Carney recused himself from decisions involving IBM and Accenture? The answer is not public.
$6.6B
Cúram Program Cost

Originally $1.6B in 2017. Today: +312% cost overrun.

$94M
Accenture Federal Contracts

While being a tenant in Brookfield India buildings.

BlackRock — The Revolving
Door Keeps Spinning

Carney appointed a BlackRock executive to one of the most powerful trade positions in Canada. BlackRock is not Brookfield’s competitor — it’s their co-investor and shareholder.

Glenn Purves was appointed Deputy Minister of International Trade on March 4, 2026. His previous role: Global Head of Macro Research at the BlackRock Investment Institute (Jan 2025–Mar 2026). That’s 13 months at BlackRock, then straight into the highest levels of the federal government.

At the 2024 G7 Summit, BlackRock, Microsoft, and Brookfield jointly committed to unlock public and private capital for sustainable infrastructure investment through a shared partnership.

Has Purves recused himself from decisions involving BlackRock or its co-investors? The answer is not public.

BlackRock Owns Brookfield

5.2% of Brookfield Renewable Corp.
6.7% of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp.
$288M in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

Co-Investors, Not Competitors

BlackRock + Brookfield + Microsoft: joint G7 infrastructure investment commitment, June 2024.

The Bottom Line
In a healthy democracy, the Prime Minister makes decisions in the public interest. When those decisions simultaneously enrich his former employer — and himself by extension — that is a conflict of interest. Not a conspiracy theory. A structural question that Canadian law itself recognizes as problematic.

5 Problems in 5 Sentences

The documented record, distilled.

The watchdog said so himself
The Ethics Commissioner declared under oath: “Carney’s future compensation is tied to Brookfield’s success.” This is not an opinion — it’s the official guardian speaking.
The screen doesn’t work
Triggered 13 times. Abandoned 7 times. Covers only 5% of Brookfield’s companies. Carney still met Brookfield executives 3 times after his swearing-in, including once in his own office.
Nobody is truly watching
The two men managing his conflicts can be fired by Carney himself. One admitted he doesn’t know the investment list of the fund that determines Carney’s future pay. The other held Brookfield shares.
Five coincidences — that’s a pattern
Modular housing, nuclear, AI, green transition, Maple Fund: every major government policy corresponds to a sector where Brookfield is massively invested — often via acquisitions Carney himself made.
He refused transparency
Carney refused to disclose who he met in New York and London. Documents provided to Parliament were incomplete. The Committee had to send a formal letter to force compliance.
◆ Accountability Demands

What Canadians Should Demand.

It is your right — our collective right — to be certain that the Prime Minister of Canada governs for us, not for himself and his former employer.

01
Sell the Brookfield Options
Fully divest, as any ordinary public servant would be required to do.
02
Make All Recusals Public
Canadians have the right to know which decisions their PM was blocked from making.
03
Disclose the NYC & London Meetings
Comply fully with the Ethics Committee’s order.

These are documented facts, sworn testimonies, and primary sources. Not partisan politics. A structural question that Canadian law itself recognizes as problematic.